• Skip to content

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.®

  • People
  • Focus
  • Services

    Find Your Lawyer

    Janet L. HoffmanEsteban Monge-MoreraSherri N. DuitzNadine H. JacobsonAmanda B. AgatiCarlos CucurellaEric T. GordonCraig S. MendeDarra FrinoAngela RamanauskasAllison Strickland RickettsAdrian E. Harrison Jr.Maritza C. SchaefferRobin N. BaydurcanKatherine Lyon DaytonCourtney B. ShierRobert A. BeckerLauren NathanJessica G. OgdenSarah MarmonRichard Z. LehvMary StotteleDavid A. DonahueAlejandra Camacho LunaJason D. JonesNicole TenoreJ. Asheton LemayParker C. EudyMassimo B. CapizziBrian LearyCharles T.J. Weigell, IIINancy E. SabarraAshford TuckerLydia T. GobenaNancy DiConzaTodd MartinAndrew N. FredbeckAlexandra E. KochianCole S. MathewsShelby P. RokitoJames D. WeinbergerLeo KittayTamar Niv BessingerLaura Popp-RosenbergBarbara A. SolomonChristina SauerbornJames D. SilbersteinJoyce M. FerraroJohn P. MargiottaCarole E. Klinger
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • u
    • v
    • w
    • x
    • y
    • z
    • View All
ShareBookmarkPrint

Alerts

China: AMENDMENTS TO TRADEMARK LAW TAKE AIM AT BAD FAITH FILINGS

September 26, 2019

By Robin N. Baydurcan

Earlier this year the Chinese legislature announced that it had approved amendments to the country’s trademark law, effective November 1, 2019. This round of amendments focuses on bad-faith trademark applications and those who file them.

Pursuant to the amendments,More

Argentina: AMENDMENTS TO TRADEMARK LAW

September 26, 2019

By Alejandra Camacho Luna

On May 27, 2019, the Argentine National Institute of Industrial Property (INAP) issued Resolution No. 123/2019, which introduces various amendments to the Argentinean Trademark Law. The amendments include new declaration of use requirements, modifications to renewal terms, time-extensions to respond to Office actions,More

U.S. Copyright Office: adidas AG Walks Away with a Victory

September 26, 2019

By Julia Belagorudsky

After a two-year battle with the U.S. Copyright Office, adidas AG finally secured a favorable decision from the Review Board of the U.S. Copyright Office on May 8, 2019.  The decision greenlighted some of the design elements of the Yeezy 350 Boost Version 1 and Version 2 for copyright protection. More

Poland – Changes in Trademark Law

August 12, 2019

By Janet L. Hoffman

Certain changes to the Polish Intellectual Property Law came into force on March 16, 2019.  The most significant changes were in response to EU Directive 2015/2463 of the European Parliament and of the Counsel of December 16,More

New USPTO Requirements for All Applicants/Registrants

July 3, 2019

By Allison Strickland Ricketts

1. All Applicants/Registrants — Domicile Information (required now)

The
USPTO now requires all applicants and registrants to provide their physical
street address in order to establish their “domicile.” The USPTO requires
domicile information even if the trademark owner is represented by counsel.More

Supreme Court: Iancu v. Brunetti

June 24, 2019

By Richard Z. Lehv

Prohibition of “Immoral or Scandalous” Marks Struck Down

Iancu v. Brunetti, 586 U.S.
___ (2019)

The United States Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional the provision of Section 2(a) of the U.S.More

Canada: New Trademark Regime

June 17, 2019

The long-awaited new Canadian trademark regime came into force on June 17, 2019.  In its final form, the most significant changes include the following:

Registration

  • classification of goods and services based on the Nice Classification;
  • a per-class fee structure 
  • More

Supreme Court: Copyright Registration Prerequisite to Civil Infringement Action

June 17, 2019

Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corporation v. Wall-Street.Com, LLC, No. 17-571, 586 U.S. ____ (2019)

In its unanimous March 4, 2019 opinion, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in holding that copyright owners must wait for the U.S.More

Supreme Court: Meaning of “Full Costs” in Section 505 of the Copyright Act Clarified

June 17, 2019

Rimini
Street, Inc. v. Oracle USA, Inc.
, 139 S.Ct. 873 (2019)

Section 505 of the
Copyright Act permits a court to award “full costs.”  The general federal statute governing awards
of costs specifies six categories of litigation expenses that qualify as
“costs:” More

Supreme Court: Bankrupt Trademark Licensor Cannot Terminate Trademark License

June 17, 2019

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 21
  • Go to Next Page »
  • Sitemap
© 2026 Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.®
  • Fross Zelnick and FZ are registered trademarks of Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal & Privacy
  • Connect with us on LinkedIn
  • Contact

Stay Connected

  • People
  • Focus
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Celebrities, Bands & Athletes
    • Consumer Products
    • Entertainment Properties
    • Fashion
    • Food & Beverage
    • Hospitality & Hotels
    • Jewelry & Watches
    • Personal Care & Cosmetics
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Professional Services
    • Publishing
    • Sports
    • Startup & Emerging Growth
    • Toys
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright
    • Design
    • Data Privacy
    • Publicity & Privacy Rights
    • Litigation
    • International
    • Transactions
    • Social Media & Domain Names
  • Decisions
  • Newsroom
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Recognition
    • Careers
    • Pro Bono
    • Contact