• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Fross Zelnick

  • People
  • Focus
  • Services

    Find Your Lawyer

    David A. DonahueCarlos CucurellaAngela RamanauskasCraig S. MendeSarah MarmonAlexandra E. KochianCharles T.J. Weigell, IIIShelby P. RokitoParker C. EudyNancy DiConzaMary StotteleKaren LimAmanda B. AgatiMassimo B. CapizziRobert A. BeckerEric T. GordonAllison Strickland RickettsCourtney B. ShierJ. Asheton LemayJames D. WeinbergerRobin N. BaydurcanKatherine Lyon DaytonLeo KittayAdrian E. Harrison Jr.Carole E. KlingerAndrew N. FredbeckTodd MartinKimberly B. FrumkinLaura Popp-RosenbergLydia T. GobenaTamar Niv BessingerJanet L. HoffmanNadine H. JacobsonSherri N. DuitzDarra FrinoCole S. MathewsAlejandra Camacho LunaLauren NathanJohn P. MargiottaRichard Z. LehvNancy E. SabarraAshford TuckerJames D. SilbersteinMaritza C. SchaefferChristina SauerbornBrian LearyJoyce M. FerraroBarbara A. SolomonEsteban Monge-MoreraJason D. JonesNicole Tenore
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • u
    • v
    • w
    • x
    • y
    • z
    • View All
ShareBookmarkPrintPDF

January 1, 2016

Jack Wolfskin Ausrustung Fur Draussen GmbH & Co. KGAA v. New Millennium Sports, S.L.U.

797 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136 S.Ct. 982 (2016)

On behalf of our client Jack Wolfskin Ausrustung Fur Draussen GmbH, we obtained a reversal of a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The TTAB had found that our client’s application was likely to cause confusion with the appellee’s registered mark, but the Federal Circuit held that the TTAB erred by improperly dissecting the appellee’s mark and by giving insufficient weight to voluminous evidence of third party use we submitted supporting our client’s position. Following the decision, New Millennium filed a petition for certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court. On behalf of Jack Wolfskin, we filed a brief opposing the petition. On January 25, 2016, the Supreme Court denied the petition and declined to hear the case, letting the Federal Circuit decision stand.

View Related Document (file: Federal Circuit Decision (F1755760x96B9E))

Primary Sidebar

Related

People

  • Richard Z. Lehv

    Senior Litigation Counsel

  • Robert A. Becker

    Senior Counsel

Focus

  • Fashion

Services

  • Trademark
  • Litigation
  • Sitemap
© 2025 Fross Zelnick
  • Fross Zelnick and FZ are registered trademarks of Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal & Privacy
  • Connect with us on LinkedIn
  • Contact

Stay Connected

  • People
  • Focus
    • Celebrities, Bands & Athletes
    • Consumer Products
    • Entertainment Properties
    • Fashion
    • Startup & Emerging Growth
    • Food & Beverage
    • Hospitality & Hotels
    • Jewelry & Watches
    • Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs)
    • Personal Care & Cosmetics
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Professional Services
    • Publishing
    • Sports
    • Toys
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright
    • Design
    • Data Privacy
    • Publicity & Privacy Rights
    • Litigation
    • International
    • Transactions
    • Social Media & Domain Names
  • Decisions
  • Newsroom
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Recognition
    • Careers
    • Pro Bono
    • Contact