• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

  • People
  • Focus
  • Services

    Find Your Lawyer

    Charles T.J. Weigell, IIIMaritza C. SchaefferCraig S. MendeRobert A. BeckerAshford TuckerAmanda B. AgatiDaniel M. NuzzaciRobin N. BaydurcanTommas BalducciJohn P. MargiottaKaren LimJoseph A. R. GerberLydia T. GobenaLaura Popp-RosenbergRobin L. WarrenBarbara A. SolomonSydney KipenJulia BelagorudskyAndrew N. FredbeckJason D. JonesNancy E. SabarraDavid A. DonahueRonald J. LehrmanMichael AntonucciJoyce M. FerraroRoxana MonemdjouJessica VosgerchianJanet L. HoffmanSherri N. DuitzRoger L. ZissuJames D. SilbersteinAllison Strickland RickettsRichard Z. LehvAlejandra Camacho LunaTodd MartinNadine H. JacobsonLawrence Eli ApolzonCara A. BoyleCarlos CucurellaTamar Niv BessingerLeo KittaySusan Upton DouglassJames D. WeinbergerSahil YadavKatherine Lyon DaytonDavid W. EhrlichNancy DiConzaStephen BiggerPeter Silverman
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • u
    • v
    • w
    • x
    • y
    • z
    • View All
ShareBookmarkPrintPDF

January 1, 2016

Jack Wolfskin Ausrustung Fur Draussen GmbH & Co. KGAA v. New Millennium Sports, S.L.U.

797 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136 S.Ct. 982 (2016)

On behalf of our client Jack Wolfskin Ausrustung Fur Draussen GmbH, we obtained a reversal of a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The TTAB had found that our client’s application was likely to cause confusion with the appellee’s registered mark, but the Federal Circuit held that the TTAB erred by improperly dissecting the appellee’s mark and by giving insufficient weight to voluminous evidence of third party use we submitted supporting our client’s position. Following the decision, New Millennium filed a petition for certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court. On behalf of Jack Wolfskin, we filed a brief opposing the petition. On January 25, 2016, the Supreme Court denied the petition and declined to hear the case, letting the Federal Circuit decision stand.

View Related Document

Primary Sidebar

Related

Focus

  • Fashion

Services

  • Trademark
  • Litigation
  • Sitemap
© 2021 Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal & Privacy
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
151 West 42nd St., 17th Fl.
New York, NY 10036

Contact

/ fzlz@fzlz.com

Stay Connected

  • People
  • Focus
    • Celebrities, Bands & Athletes
    • Consumer Products
    • Entertainment Properties
    • Fashion
    • Startup & Emerging Growth
    • Food & Beverage
    • Hospitality & Hotels
    • Jewelry & Watches
    • Personal Care & Cosmetics
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Professional Services
    • Publishing
    • Sports
    • Toys
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright & Content
    • Design
    • Litigation
    • Transactions
    • Publicity & Privacy
    • Social Media & Domain Names
  • Decisions
  • Newsroom
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • Offices
    • Recognition
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Web TMS
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok