• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Fross Zelnick

  • People
  • Focus
  • Services

    Find Your Lawyer

    Adrian E. Harrison Jr.Nicole TenoreAshford TuckerMaritza C. SchaefferKimberly B. FrumkinCarlos CucurellaBrian LearyKatherine Lyon DaytonEsteban Monge-MoreraTamar Niv BessingerLauren NathanCole S. MathewsMassimo B. CapizziAllison Strickland RickettsCharles T.J. Weigell, IIICourtney B. ShierAlexandra E. KochianLaura Popp-RosenbergLeo KittayParker C. EudyShelby P. RokitoNadine H. JacobsonRobert A. BeckerAngela RamanauskasNancy E. SabarraMary StotteleCarole E. KlingerAndrew N. FredbeckSarah MarmonJohn P. MargiottaChristina SauerbornLydia T. GobenaAlejandra Camacho LunaNancy DiConzaEric T. GordonSherri N. DuitzAmanda B. AgatiDarra FrinoJoyce M. FerraroJames D. WeinbergerDavid A. DonahueCraig S. MendeRichard Z. LehvRobin N. BaydurcanBarbara A. SolomonJason D. JonesKaren LimJames D. SilbersteinJanet L. HoffmanTodd MartinJ. Asheton Lemay
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • u
    • v
    • w
    • x
    • y
    • z
    • View All
ShareBookmarkPrintPDF

January 1, 2016

Jack Wolfskin Ausrustung Fur Draussen GmbH & Co. KGAA v. New Millennium Sports, S.L.U.

797 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136 S.Ct. 982 (2016)

On behalf of our client Jack Wolfskin Ausrustung Fur Draussen GmbH, we obtained a reversal of a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The TTAB had found that our client’s application was likely to cause confusion with the appellee’s registered mark, but the Federal Circuit held that the TTAB erred by improperly dissecting the appellee’s mark and by giving insufficient weight to voluminous evidence of third party use we submitted supporting our client’s position. Following the decision, New Millennium filed a petition for certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court. On behalf of Jack Wolfskin, we filed a brief opposing the petition. On January 25, 2016, the Supreme Court denied the petition and declined to hear the case, letting the Federal Circuit decision stand.

View Related Document (file: Federal Circuit Decision (F1755760x96B9E))

Primary Sidebar

Related

People

  • Richard Z. Lehv

    Senior Litigation Counsel

  • Robert A. Becker

    Senior Counsel

Focus

  • Fashion

Services

  • Trademark
  • Litigation
  • Sitemap
© 2025 Fross Zelnick
  • Fross Zelnick and FZ are registered trademarks of Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal & Privacy
  • Connect with us on LinkedIn
  • Contact

Stay Connected

  • People
  • Focus
    • Celebrities, Bands & Athletes
    • Consumer Products
    • Entertainment Properties
    • Fashion
    • Startup & Emerging Growth
    • Food & Beverage
    • Hospitality & Hotels
    • Jewelry & Watches
    • Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs)
    • Personal Care & Cosmetics
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Professional Services
    • Publishing
    • Sports
    • Toys
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright
    • Design
    • Data Privacy
    • Publicity & Privacy Rights
    • Litigation
    • International
    • Transactions
    • Social Media & Domain Names
  • Decisions
  • Newsroom
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Recognition
    • Careers
    • Pro Bono
    • Contact