• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content

Fross Zelnick

  • People
  • Focus
  • Services

    Find Your Lawyer

    Craig S. MendeAlejandra Camacho LunaRobin N. BaydurcanCarlos CucurellaJanet L. HoffmanMary StotteleJames D. SilbersteinNicole LiebermanJohn P. MargiottaBarbara A. SolomonShelby P. RokitoLydia T. GobenaKimberly B. FrumkinJennifer GibbinsSara GoldmanAlexandra LenczewskiRoger L. ZissuLeo KittayRichard Z. LehvCharles T.J. Weigell, IIINancy DiConzaMaritza C. SchaefferJason D. JonesSusan Upton DouglassJoyce M. FerraroTamar Niv BessingerDavid A. DonahueLaura Popp-RosenbergLouise E. DecoppetAmanda B. AgatiAllison Strickland RickettsDaniel M. NuzzaciJames D. WeinbergerTodd MartinAlexandra E. KochianSahil YadavAdrian E. Harrison Jr.Andrew N. FredbeckDavid W. EhrlichLawrence Eli ApolzonSherri N. DuitzAshford TuckerKatherine Lyon DaytonNancy E. SabarraStephen BiggerRobert A. BeckerChristina SauerbornRobin L. WarrenCara A. BoyleRonald J. LehrmanCole S. MathewsPeter SilvermanKaren LimNadine H. Jacobson
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • u
    • v
    • w
    • x
    • y
    • z
    • View All

Decisions

Novus Group, Inc. v. Dean Witter, Discover & Co.

April 9, 1994

93 Civ. 1056A (E.D. Va.)

We successfully represented Discover Card defendants in a jury trial in the so-called “Rocket Docket” against claims for alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition. Plaintiff, a Washington, D.C. business consulting firm, claimed that defendants’ adoption of the subsidiary mark “Novus”More

Schieffelin & Co. v. Jack Co. of Boca Inc.

January 1, 1994

850 F. Supp. 232 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

Marie Driscoll protected the DOM PERIGNON trademark against “Dom Popingnon” popcorn. [Marie Driscoll]More

Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Balducci

January 1, 1994

28 F.3d 769 (8th Cir. 1994)

In this action by our client Anheuser-Busch over misuse of the MICHELOB trademark in what the defendants claimed was a parody advertisement, the Eighth Circuit reversed a district court decision holding the ad was protected by the First Amendment.More

Financial Matters v. PepsiCo, Inc.

September 23, 1993

1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13294; 1994 Trade Cas. (CCH) P70521 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 1993)

We established PepsiCo, Inc.’s ownership of world famous STOLICHNAYA mark for vodka following dissolution of former U.S.S.R. and obtained preliminary injunction and later a final judgment against an infringer acting under the authority of officials of a former Soviet state.More

Twin Peaks Prods., Inc. v. Publications Int’l, Ltd.

January 1, 1993

996 F.2d 1366 (2d Cir. 1993)

Our client, the producer of the “Twin Peaks” television series, brought suit for copyright and trademark infringement against the publisher of an unauthorized trivia book about the series. The district court found that the defendant was a willful infringer,More

Sun Pharmaceuticals v. Tanning Research

June 30, 1992

No. 90-CV-06147 (S.D. Fla. June 30, 1992)

We obtained a preliminary injunction on a trade dress claim concerning the design of suntan lotion packages.More

Coors Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.

January 1, 1992

802 F. Supp. 965 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)

Coors claimed that television and radio commercials run by our client Anheuser-Busch stating that Coors’ beer was shipped in railroad tankers and diluted with local water, disparaged its beer. The court denied Coors’s motion for a preliminary injunction and allowed the commercials to continue running because of Coors’More

Kenner Parker Toys Inc. v. Rose Art Indus., Inc.

January 1, 1992

963 F.2d 350 (Fed. Cir. 1992)

In a frequently cited case that established the proposition that famous marks are entitled to strong protection, we successfully opposed competitor’s application to register mark FUNDOUGH due to potential confusion with Parker’s mark PLAY-DOH.More

Pump, Inc. v. Collins Management

January 1, 1990

746 F. Supp. 1159 (D. Mass. 1990)

In one of the only decisions of its kind, the district court ruled in favor of our clients in finding that there was no likelihood of confusion when the identical mark “Pump” was used as the name of an album by our client,More

Maher & Maher, Inc. v. Unisonic Products Corp.

January 1, 1989

719 F. Supp. 161 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)

We obtained a preliminary injunction against defendant’s sale of telephones that copied the trade dress of our client’s “Fun Phones,” unique lucite-cased telephones with brightly colored components.More

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 9
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to page 11
  • Go to page 12
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to Next Page »
  • Sitemap
© 2022 Fross Zelnick
  • Fross Zelnick and FZ are registered trademarks of Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal & Privacy
  • Connect with us on LinkedIn
Fross Zelnick
Fross Zelnick
151 West 42nd St., 17th Fl.
New York, NY 10036

Contact

/ fzlz@fzlz.com

/ Fross Zelnick and FZ are registered trademarks of Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

/ Fross Zelnick and FZ are registered trademarks of Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

Stay Connected

  • People
  • Focus
    • Celebrities, Bands & Athletes
    • Consumer Products
    • Entertainment Properties
    • Fashion
    • Startup & Emerging Growth
    • Food & Beverage
    • Hospitality & Hotels
    • Jewelry & Watches
    • Personal Care & Cosmetics
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Professional Services
    • Publishing
    • Sports
    • Toys
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright
    • Design
    • Litigation
    • Transactions
    • Publicity & Privacy
    • Social Media & Domain Names
  • Decisions
  • Newsroom
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • Offices
    • Recognition
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Web TMS