• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

  • People
  • Focus
  • Services

    Find Your Lawyer

    Barbara A. SolomonLeo KittaySydney KipenTamar Niv BessingerJames D. SilbersteinAlejandra Camacho LunaDavid A. DonahueCraig S. MendeKatherine Lyon DaytonMichael AntonucciRobin N. BaydurcanRobert A. BeckerLaura Popp-RosenbergCarlos CucurellaJanet L. HoffmanJohn P. MargiottaTodd MartinJames D. WeinbergerAllison Strickland RickettsJulia BelagorudskyTommas BalducciDavid W. EhrlichDaniel M. NuzzaciRichard Z. LehvStephen BiggerLydia T. GobenaKaren LimNadine H. JacobsonJoyce M. FerraroAmanda B. AgatiCharles T.J. Weigell, IIIJason D. JonesSherri N. DuitzJoseph A. R. GerberNancy DiConzaMaritza C. SchaefferCara A. BoyleLawrence Eli ApolzonSusan Upton DouglassNancy E. SabarraRoxana MonemdjouRoger L. ZissuPeter SilvermanRobin L. WarrenJessica VosgerchianRonald J. LehrmanAndrew N. FredbeckAshford TuckerSahil Yadav
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • u
    • v
    • w
    • x
    • y
    • z
    • View All
ShareBookmarkPrintPDF

July 31, 2007

Polar Bear Productions, Inc. v. Timex Corp.

No. 05-35811, 2007 WL 2193541 (9th Cir. July 31, 2007); 384 F.3d 700 (9th Cir. 2004)

The firm successfully concluded its representation of Timex Corporation in its defense against copyright and trademark infringement claims brought against it by Polar Bear Productions, Inc. In 2002, when our firm first became involved in the case, Polar Bear had been awarded a $2.415 million jury verdict for Timex’s copyright infringement of a kayaking video entitled “PaddleQuest.” We took over the appeal, and, in 2004, the Ninth Circuit vacated the entire $2.1 million award under Section 504(b) of the Copyright Act of Timex’s profits allegedly attributable to the copyright infringement as unduly speculative and cut the damage award from $315,000 to $115,000 on the same grounds. The case was then remanded to the district court on Polar Bear’s remaining trademark claims. Upon Timex’s motion, the court dismissed all of Polar Bear’s remaining trademark claims, and Polar Bear appealed the dismissal of its claims to the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth Circuit, in an unpublished opinion dated July 21, 2007, affirmed final dismissal of the case.

View Related Document

Primary Sidebar

Related

People

  • John P. Margiotta

    Partner

Focus

  • Jewelry & Watches

Services

  • Copyright & Content
  • Litigation
  • Sitemap
© 2021 Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal & Privacy
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
151 West 42nd St., 17th Fl.
New York, NY 10036

Contact

/ fzlz@fzlz.com

Stay Connected

  • People
  • Focus
    • Celebrities, Bands & Athletes
    • Consumer Products
    • Entertainment Properties
    • Fashion
    • Startup & Emerging Growth
    • Food & Beverage
    • Hospitality & Hotels
    • Jewelry & Watches
    • Personal Care & Cosmetics
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Professional Services
    • Publishing
    • Sports
    • Toys
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright & Content
    • Design
    • Litigation
    • Transactions
    • Publicity & Privacy
    • Social Media & Domain Names
  • Decisions
  • Newsroom
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • Offices
    • Recognition
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Web TMS
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok