• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.®

  • People
  • Focus
  • Services

    Find Your Lawyer

    Richard Z. LehvLydia T. GobenaBrian LearyNicole TenoreMary StotteleMassimo B. CapizziJason D. JonesNadine H. JacobsonLeo KittayAngela RamanauskasSarah MarmonCourtney B. ShierCole S. MathewsCharles T.J. Weigell, IIICarlos CucurellaRobin N. BaydurcanShelby P. RokitoLauren NathanTodd MartinEric T. GordonSherri N. DuitzJames D. WeinbergerTamar Niv BessingerCarole E. KlingerNancy DiConzaAlejandra Camacho LunaKatherine Lyon DaytonJessica G. OgdenJ. Asheton LemayJames D. SilbersteinLaura Popp-RosenbergCraig S. MendeJohn P. MargiottaChristina SauerbornEsteban Monge-MoreraNancy E. SabarraJoyce M. FerraroAllison Strickland RickettsParker C. EudyAndrew N. FredbeckRobert A. BeckerBarbara A. SolomonAdrian E. Harrison Jr.Darra FrinoJanet L. HoffmanAlexandra E. KochianMaritza C. SchaefferAshford TuckerDavid A. DonahueAmanda B. Agati
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • u
    • v
    • w
    • x
    • y
    • z
    • View All
ShareBookmarkPrint

April 30, 2020

Saleh v. Sulka Trading Ltd., et al.

Case No. 19-2461 (2d Cir. 2020)

The Second Circuit affirmed the S.D.N.Y.’s dismissal of a declaratory judgment action brought by Plaintiff Abdul Rehman Karim Saleh against our clients, Sulka Trading Ltd. and A. Sulka and Company Limited (together, “Sulka”). Sulka filed its motion to dismiss based on the ground that there was no actual controversy between the parties sufficient to create subject matter jurisdiction under the Declaratory Judgment Act because Saleh showed no evidence of an intent and ability to use the SULKA mark in an infringing manner in the U. S. In dismissing the action, the S.D.N.Y. agreed that our clients rightly objected to plaintiff’s attempt to use a declaratory judgment action to determine what activities he could engage in that he did not have any intent or ability to pursue, adding that Saleh was not entitled to jurisdictional discovery because he had failed to show any colorable claim to jurisdiction.

Saleh has re-filed his suit, alleging that he is now doing business in the U.S., and Sulka has again moved to dismiss the case. That motion is pending.  

Primary Sidebar

Related

People

  • John P. Margiotta

    Partner

  • David A. Donahue

    Partner

Services

  • Litigation
  • Trademark
  • Sitemap
© 2026 Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.®
  • Fross Zelnick and FZ are registered trademarks of Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal & Privacy
  • Connect with us on LinkedIn
  • Contact

Stay Connected

  • People
  • Focus
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Celebrities, Bands & Athletes
    • Consumer Products
    • Entertainment Properties
    • Fashion
    • Food & Beverage
    • Hospitality & Hotels
    • Jewelry & Watches
    • Personal Care & Cosmetics
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Professional Services
    • Publishing
    • Sports
    • Startup & Emerging Growth
    • Toys
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright
    • Design
    • Data Privacy
    • Publicity & Privacy Rights
    • Litigation
    • International
    • Transactions
    • Social Media & Domain Names
  • Decisions
  • Newsroom
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Recognition
    • Careers
    • Pro Bono
    • Contact