• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Fross Zelnick

  • People
  • Focus
  • Services

    Find Your Lawyer

    Amanda B. AgatiCole S. MathewsJohn P. MargiottaAshford TuckerRobert A. BeckerRichard Z. LehvJanet L. HoffmanNadine H. JacobsonBrian LearyCharles T.J. Weigell, IIIJennifer GibbinsLeo KittayTodd MartinCara A. BoyleAlejandra Camacho LunaDaniel M. NuzzaciKimberly B. FrumkinAdrian E. Harrison Jr.Carlos CucurellaRobin L. WarrenKaren LimLaura Popp-RosenbergCraig S. MendeJames D. SilbersteinSara GoldmanMaritza C. SchaefferAlexandra LenczewskiJason D. JonesChristina SauerbornJames D. WeinbergerBarbara A. SolomonNancy E. SabarraSahil YadavTamar Niv BessingerKatherine Lyon DaytonAndrew N. FredbeckNicole LiebermanAngela García MedinaNancy DiConzaShelby P. RokitoSherri N. DuitzAllison Strickland RickettsAlexandra E. KochianJoyce M. FerraroLydia T. GobenaDavid A. DonahueMary StotteleRobin N. BaydurcanLawrence Eli Apolzon
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • u
    • v
    • w
    • x
    • y
    • z
    • View All
ShareBookmarkPrintPDF

April 30, 2020

Saleh v. Sulka Trading Ltd., et al.

Case No. 19-2461 (2d Cir. 2020)

The Second Circuit affirmed the S.D.N.Y.’s dismissal of a declaratory judgment action brought by Plaintiff Abdul Rehman Karim Saleh against our clients, Sulka Trading Ltd. and A. Sulka and Company Limited (together, “Sulka”). Sulka filed its motion to dismiss based on the ground that there was no actual controversy between the parties sufficient to create subject matter jurisdiction under the Declaratory Judgment Act because Saleh showed no evidence of an intent and ability to use the SULKA mark in an infringing manner in the U. S. In dismissing the action, the S.D.N.Y. agreed that our clients rightly objected to plaintiff’s attempt to use a declaratory judgment action to determine what activities he could engage in that he did not have any intent or ability to pursue, adding that Saleh was not entitled to jurisdictional discovery because he had failed to show any colorable claim to jurisdiction.

Saleh has re-filed his suit, alleging that he is now doing business in the U.S., and Sulka has again moved to dismiss the case. That motion is pending.  

Primary Sidebar

Related

People

  • John P. Margiotta

    Partner

  • David A. Donahue

    Partner

Services

  • Litigation
  • Trademark
  • Sitemap
© 2023 Fross Zelnick
  • Fross Zelnick and FZ are registered trademarks of Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal & Privacy
  • Connect with us on LinkedIn
  • Contact

Stay Connected

  • People
  • Focus
    • Celebrities, Bands & Athletes
    • Consumer Products
    • Entertainment Properties
    • Fashion
    • Startup & Emerging Growth
    • Food & Beverage
    • Hospitality & Hotels
    • Jewelry & Watches
    • Personal Care & Cosmetics
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Professional Services
    • Publishing
    • Sports
    • Toys
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright
    • Design
    • Litigation
    • Transactions
    • Publicity & Privacy
    • Social Media & Domain Names
  • Decisions
  • Newsroom
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • Contact
    • Recognition
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Web TMS