• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Fross Zelnick

  • People
  • Focus
  • Services

    Find Your Lawyer

    Richard Z. LehvNancy E. SabarraNadine H. JacobsonCarlos CucurellaDavid A. DonahueKatherine Lyon DaytonAmanda B. AgatiJason D. JonesLawrence Eli ApolzonBarbara A. SolomonAlexandra E. KochianChristina SauerbornJohn P. MargiottaMary StotteleAllison Strickland RickettsSara GoldmanRobin L. WarrenCole S. MathewsKimberly B. FrumkinAdrian E. Harrison Jr.Leo KittaySahil YadavKaren LimAlejandra Camacho LunaJames D. SilbersteinCharles T.J. Weigell, IIITodd MartinLydia T. GobenaJoyce M. FerraroNicole LiebermanLaura Popp-RosenbergCara A. BoyleAlexandra LenczewskiAngela García MedinaCraig S. MendeMaritza C. SchaefferShelby P. RokitoNancy DiConzaDaniel M. NuzzaciTamar Niv BessingerBrian LearyJames D. WeinbergerSherri N. DuitzAshford TuckerJennifer GibbinsRobert A. BeckerAndrew NietesJanet L. HoffmanAndrew N. FredbeckRobin N. Baydurcan
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • u
    • v
    • w
    • x
    • y
    • z
    • View All
ShareBookmarkPrintPDF

August 10, 2022

APP Group (Canada) Inc. d/b/a Mackage and A.P.P. Group Inc. d/b/a Mackage v. Rudsak USA Inc.

We represented Rudsak USA Inc., the U.S. subsidiary of a Canadian streetwear brand, in its defense against for trade dress infringement, unfair competition, and dilution brought by its rival APP Group (Canada), doing business as Mackage, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Mackage claimed that Rudsak had infringed two design features on its coats: a fur-lined v-shaped collar, and an asymmetrical zipper for luxury winter coats. Mackage sought monetary damages and injunctive relief.

We moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, and succeeded, aided by the discovery of very helpful facts—including unearthing the USPTO’s prior rejection of Mackage’s application to register the V-shaped collar as trade dress.

The court denied leave to amend and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. Mackage’s appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is pending.

View Related Document

Primary Sidebar

Related

People

  • David A. Donahue

    Partner

  • Shelby P. Rokito

    Associate

Focus

  • Fashion

Services

  • Litigation
  • Sitemap
© 2023 Fross Zelnick
  • Fross Zelnick and FZ are registered trademarks of Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal & Privacy
  • Connect with us on LinkedIn
  • Contact

Stay Connected

  • People
  • Focus
    • Celebrities, Bands & Athletes
    • Consumer Products
    • Entertainment Properties
    • Fashion
    • Startup & Emerging Growth
    • Food & Beverage
    • Hospitality & Hotels
    • Jewelry & Watches
    • Personal Care & Cosmetics
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Professional Services
    • Publishing
    • Sports
    • Toys
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright
    • Design
    • Litigation
    • Transactions
    • Publicity & Privacy
    • Social Media & Domain Names
  • Decisions
  • Newsroom
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • Contact
    • Recognition
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Web TMS