• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.®

  • People
  • Focus
  • Services

    Find Your Lawyer

    Craig S. MendeLydia T. GobenaLauren NathanMary StotteleNancy E. SabarraKatherine Lyon DaytonJanet L. HoffmanCarlos CucurellaMaritza C. SchaefferRobert A. BeckerAngela RamanauskasAllison Strickland RickettsCourtney B. ShierRobin N. BaydurcanBarbara A. SolomonAlexandra E. KochianEsteban Monge-MoreraCole S. MathewsNicole TenoreSarah MarmonMassimo B. CapizziJessica G. OgdenParker C. EudyDavid A. DonahueBrian LearyTamar Niv BessingerAdrian E. Harrison Jr.James D. WeinbergerEric T. GordonNancy DiConzaDarra FrinoRichard Z. LehvAlejandra Camacho LunaAshford TuckerCharles T.J. Weigell, IIILaura Popp-RosenbergJason D. JonesSherri N. DuitzNadine H. JacobsonTodd MartinAndrew N. FredbeckJoyce M. FerraroChristina SauerbornJohn P. MargiottaShelby P. RokitoAmanda B. AgatiCarole E. KlingerJ. Asheton LemayJames D. SilbersteinLeo Kittay
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • u
    • v
    • w
    • x
    • y
    • z
    • View All
ShareBookmarkPrint

Search Again

Alerts March 1, 2017

India: Update On Prius Well-Known Mark Decision

By Karen Lim

Prius Auto Industries Ltd v. Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha (RFA (OS) 62/2016)

We update our previous article on the July 2016 ruling by a single judge of the High Court of Delhi recognizing Toyota’s unregistered PRIUS mark as well known worldwide:

On appeal by Prius Auto, the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court set aside the permanent injunction granted by the single judge prohibiting Prius Auto from using the PRIUS mark, holding that Toyota had failed to establish the trans-border reputation of its PRIUS mark in India when Prius Auto adopted the same name.  In particular, the Division Bench noted that:

•     Reports in the print media of Toyota’s launch of its PRIUS car in 1997 may not have been sufficiently prominent as to attract the attention of the public at large;

•     Toyota provided no evidence of advertisements in India related to its PRIUS car before it was sold for the first time in the country in 2001;

•     Internet penetration in India was low in 2001;

•     Prius Auto had sold its cars in India for nearly ten years without confusion when Toyota filed suit.

This decision signals that plaintiffs could be required to make strong showings of trans-border reputation going forward.

Primary Sidebar

Search Again

Related

Services

  • International
  • Trademark
  • Sitemap
© 2025 Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.®
  • Fross Zelnick and FZ are registered trademarks of Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal & Privacy
  • Connect with us on LinkedIn
  • Contact

Stay Connected

  • People
  • Focus
    • Celebrities, Bands & Athletes
    • Consumer Products
    • Entertainment Properties
    • Fashion
    • Startup & Emerging Growth
    • Food & Beverage
    • Hospitality & Hotels
    • Jewelry & Watches
    • Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs)
    • Personal Care & Cosmetics
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Professional Services
    • Publishing
    • Sports
    • Toys
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright
    • Design
    • Data Privacy
    • Publicity & Privacy Rights
    • Litigation
    • International
    • Transactions
    • Social Media & Domain Names
  • Decisions
  • Newsroom
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Recognition
    • Careers
    • Pro Bono
    • Contact