• Skip to content

Fross Zelnick

  • People
  • Focus
  • Services

    Find Your Lawyer

    Maritza C. SchaefferAshford TuckerEsteban Monge-MoreraJ. Asheton LemayAdrian E. Harrison Jr.Courtney B. ShierCraig S. MendeNancy E. SabarraParker C. EudyKatherine Lyon DaytonRobert A. BeckerTodd MartinJames D. WeinbergerTamar Niv BessingerCole S. MathewsBrian LearyCarlos CucurellaLaura Popp-RosenbergSarah MarmonJohn P. MargiottaLydia T. GobenaNancy DiConzaAllison Strickland RickettsJason D. JonesNicole TenoreAmanda B. AgatiJames D. SilbersteinKaren LimRichard Z. LehvEric T. GordonDavid A. DonahueDarra FrinoMary StotteleAndrew N. FredbeckNadine H. JacobsonAngela RamanauskasBarbara A. SolomonKimberly B. FrumkinCharles T.J. Weigell, IIISherri N. DuitzAlejandra Camacho LunaJoyce M. FerraroAlexandra E. KochianLauren NathanCarole E. KlingerChristina SauerbornJanet L. HoffmanRobin N. BaydurcanLeo KittayShelby P. Rokito
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • u
    • v
    • w
    • x
    • y
    • z
    • View All

Alerts

European Union: Rubik’s Cube Shape Found Ineligible for Trademark Protection

March 21, 2017

By Hindy Dym

Simba Toys GmbH & Co. K.G v. European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Seven Towns Ltd. (Case C-30/15 P, November 10, 2016)

The Court of Justice of the European Union (“ECJ”) recently issued a final decision in a ten-year dispute surrounding the trademark protection of the Rubik’s Cube. More

European Union: Territorial Exceptions to Prohibitions Against Use of Infringing Trademarks

March 21, 2017

Combit Software GmbH v. Commit Business Solutions Ltd. (Case C-223/15) (September 22, 2016)

In a recent decision, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“ECJ”) determined that when an EU trademark court prohibits use of a sign that creates a likelihood of confusion in one part of the EU,More

China: Michael Jordan (Partially) Defeats Chinese Trademark Pirate Based on Unregistered Personal-Name Rights

March 21, 2017

By Robin N. Baydurcan

Michael Jeffrey Jordan v. China Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, with the third party QIAODAN Sports Company, Supreme People’s Court 2016

In December 2016, former Chicago Bulls basketball phenom Michael Jordan obtained an unprecedented victory in cancelling several third-party registrations for “Jordan” in Chinese characters,More

Canada: New Regulations Governing Display of Non-French Trademarks

March 21, 2017

By Karen Lim

On November 24, 2016, changes to Quebec’s signage laws went into effect requiring businesses to add French-language descriptors or slogans to storefront signage displaying non-French trademarks.  The amendments are intended to ensure the presence of French on storefronts that display non-French trademarks,More

Australia: Limited Privilege for Communications with Registered Trademark Attorneys

March 17, 2017

By Maritza C. Schaeffer

Titan Enterprises (QLD) Pty Ltd v. Cross, Federal Court of Australia(Case No. [2016] FCA 1241, October 19, 2016)

Section 229 of the Australian Trademarks Act 1995 (“Section 229”) defines the scope of privileged protection for communications with registered trademark attorneys. More

United States Patent and Trademark Office: Post-Registration Audit Program

March 14, 2017

By Allison Strickland Ricketts

Effective March 21, 2017, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) plans to implement a post-registration audit program to obtain additional evidence of use of registered marks.  The Office’s notice of final rulemaking can be viewed at www.gpo.gov.More

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board: Family of Marks can have Different Owners so Long as there is Unity of Control

March 14, 2017

By Emily Weiss

Wise F&I, LLC, et al. v. Allstate Insurance Co., Consolidated Opp. No. 91226028 (T.T.A.B. Sept. 23, 2016)

In Wise F&I, LLC v. Allstate Insurance Co.,
Consolidated Opp. No. 91226028 (T.T.A.B. Sept. 23,More

Federal Circuit: Assignments of Intent-to-Use Applications Will be Closely Scrutinized

March 14, 2017

By Leo Kittay

Emerald Cities Collaborative, Inc. v. Roese, No. 2016-1703, 2016 WL 7210145 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2016) (not precedential)

The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Emerald Cities Collaborative, Inc. v. Roese provides a reminder that any agreement to assign a pending intent-to-use trademark application will be closely scrutinized to determine whether the transfer violates the statutory prohibition against trafficking in inchoate marks. More

Federal Circuit: Reiteration of High Threshold for Descriptiveness Refusals

March 14, 2017

In re Driven Innovations, Inc., Ser. No. 77073701 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 4, 2017) (not precedential)

The U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently reversed a Trademark Trial and Appeal
Board (“TTAB”) decision in which the Board upheld a Section 2(e)(1)
descriptiveness refusal for the DOTBLOG mark. More

Federal Circuit: In-State Sale of Two Hats Constitutes Use in Commerce

March 14, 2017

By Jessica Vosgerchian

Christian Faith Fellowship Church v. adidas AG, 120 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1640 (Fed. Cir. 2016))

On appeal by Christian
Faith Fellowship Church (the “Church”), the Federal Circuit reversed a judgment
by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board cancelling the Church’s trademarks for
failure to use them in commerce before registration. More

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Go to Next Page »
  • Sitemap
© 2025 Fross Zelnick
  • Fross Zelnick and FZ are registered trademarks of Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal & Privacy
  • Connect with us on LinkedIn
  • Contact

Stay Connected

  • People
  • Focus
    • Celebrities, Bands & Athletes
    • Consumer Products
    • Entertainment Properties
    • Fashion
    • Startup & Emerging Growth
    • Food & Beverage
    • Hospitality & Hotels
    • Jewelry & Watches
    • Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs)
    • Personal Care & Cosmetics
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Professional Services
    • Publishing
    • Sports
    • Toys
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright
    • Design
    • Data Privacy
    • Publicity & Privacy Rights
    • Litigation
    • International
    • Transactions
    • Social Media & Domain Names
  • Decisions
  • Newsroom
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Recognition
    • Careers
    • Pro Bono
    • Contact