A. National Laws do not Supplant EU law on GIs
Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto v. EU Intellectual
Property Office (EUIPO) (Case C-56/16 P)( September 14, 2017) .
On October 27, 2006,
Bruichladdich Distillery Co.More
A. National Laws do not Supplant EU law on GIs
Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto v. EU Intellectual
Property Office (EUIPO) (Case C-56/16 P)( September 14, 2017) .
On October 27, 2006,
Bruichladdich Distillery Co.More
Trade associations,
government bodies, technical institutes, and other public and private entities
that certify that goods and services meet certain quality standards are now
able to register their certification marks in the EU.
The EU certification
mark, available as of October 1, 2017,More
Guangzhou KuGou Networks Ltd v. Shantou Lifeng Electric
Appliances Ltd,
Beijing High Court (March 13, 2017)
A recent decision of the Beijing High Court granted full protection to an
unregistered trademark in a dispute against the owner of a later registration
for the mark. More
Amazon is quickly becoming a key retail platform for nearly all brand owners. Similarly, Facebook ads are often a critical part of any online advertising campaign and Facebook’s Marketplace is quickly gaining in importance. However, as many brand owners can attest, it can be hard to monitor who is selling branded merchandise improperly or misusing trademarks or copyrighted content at these sites. More
On April 18, 2017 The Parliament of the Republic of Uzbekistan issued amendments to the Law on Trademarks and Appellations of Origin and the Law on Competition. These changes became effective on April 19, 2017. The more significant changes are:
Société des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd* ([2017] EWCA Civ 358; 17.05.17)
The UK Court of Appeal recently dismissed Societé des produits Nestlé SA’s (Nestlé) appeal of a High Court decision that its three-dimensional trademark had not acquired distinctive character and could therefore not be registered in the UK.More
Milo & Gabby LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., Case No. 2016-1290 (Fed. Cir. May 23, 2017)
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently affirmed a district court’s decision that Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”) was not liable for patent, copyright, and trademark infringement based on third-party sales of pillowcases on Amazon’s website. More
Under Turkey’s new Industrial Property Law No. 6769, an unregistered design is protected for three years in the event that it is first presented to the public in Turkey. The owner may enforce its rights in the unregistered design against third parties who, without the owner’s consent,More
South Sudan, established in July 2011 after a referendum approving independence from Sudan, has not been accepting trademark applications due to the lack of a trademark law. However, the Ministry of Justice in South Sudan has confirmed that trademarks may be reserved pending the passage of a trade mark law. More
No. 301-Aд17-4305
On May 15, 2017, the Supreme Court (highest court) of the Russian Federation upheld a decision of the Russian IP court (No. A43-10065/2016) which, at first glance, appears to undermine a trademark owner’s ability to enforce its marks against unauthorized third-party uses. More
