In re Driven Innovations, Inc., Ser. No. 77073701 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 4, 2017) (not precedential)
The U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently reversed a Trademark Trial and Appeal
Board (“TTAB”) decision in which the Board upheld a Section 2(e)(1)
descriptiveness refusal for the DOTBLOG mark. More
By Jessica Vosgerchian
Christian Faith Fellowship Church v. adidas AG, 120 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1640 (Fed. Cir. 2016))
On appeal by Christian
Faith Fellowship Church (the “Church”), the Federal Circuit reversed a judgment
by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board cancelling the Church’s trademarks for
failure to use them in commerce before registration. More
By Susan Upton Douglass
In re. Jobdiva, Inc., 121 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1122 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Registrant, JobDiva, owned registrations for “personnel placement and recruitment,” but submitted as a specimen a web printout showing that it offered software on a platform (SaaS) that allowed subscribers to locate pertinent jobs. More
By Charles T.J. Weigell, III
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, 137 S. Ct. 429 (2016)
The ongoing design patent infringement action between Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) and Samsung Electronics, Co. (“Samsung”), over smartphone designs took yet another turn on December 1,More
By Karen Lim
Prius Auto Industries Ltd v. Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha (RFA (OS) 62/2016)
We update our previous article on the July 2016 ruling by a single judge of the High Court of Delhi recognizing Toyota’s unregistered PRIUS mark as well known worldwide:More