• Skip to content

Fross Zelnick

  • People
  • Focus
  • Services

    Find Your Lawyer

    Amanda B. AgatiSherri N. DuitzRobin N. BaydurcanChristina SauerbornRobert A. BeckerNancy DiConzaCharles T.J. Weigell, IIILydia T. GobenaBarbara A. SolomonCole S. MathewsKaren LimDavid A. DonahueAdrian E. Harrison Jr.Alejandra Camacho LunaAshford TuckerAlexandra E. KochianCarlos CucurellaJoyce M. FerraroTodd MartinLaura Popp-RosenbergParker C. EudyAndrew N. FredbeckBrian LearyKatherine Lyon DaytonJanet L. HoffmanNancy E. SabarraDarra FrinoCarole E. KlingerLeo KittayCraig S. MendeEric T. GordonMary StotteleMassimo B. CapizziJames D. WeinbergerRichard Z. LehvJohn P. MargiottaJ. Asheton LemayCourtney B. ShierJames D. SilbersteinKimberly B. FrumkinTamar Niv BessingerMaritza C. SchaefferAngela RamanauskasAllison Strickland RickettsNadine H. JacobsonLauren NathanSarah MarmonNicole TenoreJason D. JonesShelby P. RokitoEsteban Monge-Morera
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • u
    • v
    • w
    • x
    • y
    • z
    • View All

Alerts

Federal Circuit: In-State Sale of Two Hats Constitutes Use in Commerce

March 14, 2017

By Jessica Vosgerchian

Christian Faith Fellowship Church v. adidas AG, 120 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1640 (Fed. Cir. 2016))

On appeal by Christian
Faith Fellowship Church (the “Church”), the Federal Circuit reversed a judgment
by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board cancelling the Church’s trademarks for
failure to use them in commerce before registration. More

Federal Circuit: Specimen Showing Use of Mark for Software May also Show Use for Services

March 14, 2017

By Susan Upton Douglass

In re. Jobdiva, Inc., 121 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1122 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Registrant, JobDiva, owned registrations for “personnel placement and recruitment,” but submitted as a specimen a web printout showing that it offered software on a platform (SaaS) that allowed subscribers to locate pertinent jobs. More

Supreme Court: Court Rules on Damages for Design Patent Infringement

March 14, 2017

By Charles T.J. Weigell, III

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, 137 S. Ct. 429 (2016)

The ongoing design patent infringement action between Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) and Samsung Electronics, Co. (“Samsung”), over smartphone designs took yet another turn on December 1,More

India: Update On Prius Well-Known Mark Decision

March 1, 2017

By Karen Lim

Prius Auto Industries Ltd v. Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha (RFA (OS) 62/2016)

We update our previous article on the July 2016 ruling by a single judge of the High Court of Delhi recognizing Toyota’s unregistered PRIUS mark as well known worldwide:More

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Sitemap
© 2025 Fross Zelnick
  • Fross Zelnick and FZ are registered trademarks of Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal & Privacy
  • Connect with us on LinkedIn
  • Contact

Stay Connected

  • People
  • Focus
    • Celebrities, Bands & Athletes
    • Consumer Products
    • Entertainment Properties
    • Fashion
    • Startup & Emerging Growth
    • Food & Beverage
    • Hospitality & Hotels
    • Jewelry & Watches
    • Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs)
    • Personal Care & Cosmetics
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Professional Services
    • Publishing
    • Sports
    • Toys
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright
    • Design
    • Data Privacy
    • Publicity & Privacy Rights
    • Litigation
    • International
    • Transactions
    • Social Media & Domain Names
  • Decisions
  • Newsroom
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Recognition
    • Careers
    • Pro Bono
    • Contact