• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content

Fross Zelnick

  • People
  • Focus
  • Services

    Find Your Lawyer

    Nancy E. SabarraDavid A. DonahueAllison Strickland RickettsJohn P. MargiottaLeo KittayAmanda B. AgatiSydney KipenAndrew N. FredbeckTamar Niv BessingerJason D. JonesMaritza C. SchaefferKatherine Lyon DaytonAlejandra Camacho LunaJanet L. HoffmanPeter SilvermanSahil YadavJoyce M. FerraroNancy DiConzaNadine H. JacobsonCara A. BoyleLaura Popp-RosenbergJames D. WeinbergerDavid W. EhrlichBarbara A. SolomonJoseph A. R. GerberJames D. SilbersteinJulia BelagorudskyRobin L. WarrenLawrence Eli ApolzonCarlos CucurellaRobin N. BaydurcanMichael AntonucciCraig S. MendeRobert A. BeckerStephen BiggerTodd MartinRoger L. ZissuDaniel M. NuzzaciKaren LimAshford TuckerSherri N. DuitzSusan Upton DouglassCharles T.J. Weigell, IIILydia T. GobenaRonald J. LehrmanRoxana MonemdjouRichard Z. Lehv
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • u
    • v
    • w
    • x
    • y
    • z
    • View All

Decisions

Royal Crown Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.

January 1, 2018

892 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

On behalf of Royal Crown Company, Inc. and Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. (together, “RC”), the Firm prevailed at the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals after a nearly decade-long battle concerning whether The Coca-Cola Company (“TCCC”) could claim exclusive trademark rights to ZERO for soft drinks. More

Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.

July 1, 2013

No. 1:13-cv-00780 (N.D. Ill. July 1, 2013), aff’d 735 F.3d 735 (7th Cir. 2013)

The Firm obtained a preliminary injunction on behalf of Kraft Foods Group Brands, LLC , owner of the CRACKER BARREL trademark in connection with cheese, against restaurant company, Cracker Barrel Old Country Stores,More

Perfetti Van Melle USA v. Cadbury Adams USA LLC

January 1, 2010

732 F. Supp. 2d 712 (E.D. Ky. 2010)

On behalf of our client Cadbury Adams USA LLC–maker of the famous DENTYNE brand of chewing gum–we defeated a motion for a preliminary injunction brought by plaintiff which sought to block the launch of Cadbury’s new breath purifying gum,More

Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. v. Krush Global Limited

January 1, 2010

Opposition No. 91180742 & Cancellation No. 92048446m 2010 WL 3798550 (T.T.A.B. 2010)

Prevailed at trial on behalf of Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. in consolidated opposition and cancellation proceedings against the mark, CRUSSH.More

Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee en 1772

January 1, 2005

396 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2005)

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a successful opposition brought by our client, Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin, in the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in which it claimed that VEUVE ROYALE is confusingly similar to VEUVE CLICQUOT,More

Buffett v. Cheeseburger in Paradise, Inc.

March 11, 1998

97 CV 00214 (3/18/97) 98 CV 01730 (3/11/98) (C.D. Cal.)

In a case of first impression, we successfully argued that in a federal
court action seeking to cancel the defendant’s trademark registration, the
applicable factors to be applied are those established by the Federal Circuit,More

Carillon Importers v. Frank Pesce Int’l Group

January 1, 1997

913 F. Supp. 1559 (S.D. Fla. 1996), aff’d, 112 F.3d 1125 (11th Cir. 1997) (S.D. Fla. 1997)

We obtained a preliminary injunction in a trade dress infringement case
brought by the U.S. importer of STOLICHNAYA CRISTALL vodka.

More

Carvel Corp. v. The Ice Cream Bakery, Inc.

May 19, 1999

1999 TTAB LEXIS 217 (T.T.A.B. May 19, 1999)

We represented Carvel Corporation in its successful opposition against a
former licensee’s attempt to register the mark THE ICE CREAM BAKERY. The
applicant argued that Carvel had abandoned THE ICE CREAM BAKERY through naked
licensing,More

Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Conusa Corp.

January 1, 1989

892 F.2d 74 (4th Cir. 1989)

The Fourth Circuit protected as trademark a configuration for Lifesavers candy that had once been the subject of a design patent.More

Coors Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.

January 1, 1992

802 F. Supp. 965 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)

Coors claimed that television and radio commercials run by our client Anheuser-Busch stating that Coors’ beer was shipped in railroad tankers and diluted with local water, disparaged its beer. The court denied Coors’s motion for a preliminary injunction and allowed the commercials to continue running because of Coors’More

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to Next Page »
  • Sitemap
© 2021 Fross Zelnick
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal & Privacy
Fross Zelnick
Fross Zelnick
151 West 42nd St., 17th Fl.
New York, NY 10036

Contact

/ fzlz@fzlz.com

Stay Connected

  • People
  • Focus
    • Celebrities, Bands & Athletes
    • Consumer Products
    • Entertainment Properties
    • Fashion
    • Startup & Emerging Growth
    • Food & Beverage
    • Hospitality & Hotels
    • Jewelry & Watches
    • Personal Care & Cosmetics
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Professional Services
    • Publishing
    • Sports
    • Toys
  • Services
    • Trademark
    • Copyright & Content
    • Design
    • Litigation
    • Transactions
    • Publicity & Privacy
    • Social Media & Domain Names
  • Decisions
  • Newsroom
  • Our Firm
    • About Our Firm
    • Offices
    • Recognition
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Web TMS