Opp. No. 91232774 (T.T.A.B.)
On behalf of client Manimal, LLC, we successfully defended an opposition brought by the owner of the GARANIMALS trademark for apparel against our client’s application to register MANIMAL, also for apparel.More
Old Navy (Apparel), LLC v. Blissman
Opp. No. 91234507 (T.T.A.B.)
On behalf of client Old Navy (Apparel), LLC, we successfully opposed an application to register the mark OLD IVY for clothing before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the “TTAB”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The TTAB found that OLD IVY was confusingly similar to our client’s OLD NAVY mark,More
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Siggy Music, Inc.
2018 WL 3529479, Opp. No. 91200616, Canc. No. 92053622 (T.T.A.B. July 19, 2018)
After a seven-year battle before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, the Firm prevailed on behalf of client UMG Recordings, Inc. (“UMG”)—owner of the JACKSON 5 trademark—in its challenge to an attempt to register the mark J5 for clothing and related merchandise by Siggy Music,More
Royal Crown Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.
892 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2018)
On behalf of Royal Crown Company, Inc. and Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. (together, “RC”), the Firm prevailed at the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals after a nearly decade-long battle concerning whether The Coca-Cola Company (“TCCC”) could claim exclusive trademark rights to ZERO for soft drinks. More
Asuragen, Inc. v. Accuragen, Inc.
2018 WL 558888, Case No. 16-cv-5440-RS (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2018)
On behalf of our client, plaintiff Asuragen, Inc., the Firm defeated defendant Accuragen, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment in an infringement action between two providers of genomic services and their respective ASURAGEN and ACCURAGEN trademarks.More
Cartier International AG v. Coachman
Opp. No. 91209815 (T.T.A.B. Oct. 5, 2016)
The Firm, on behalf of our client Cartier International A.G., prevailed in an opposition proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Cartier had opposed an application to register the mark TRINITY in connection with leather handbags on the basis of likelihood of confusion with its own TRINITY mark for jewelry.More
Hoop Culture, Inc. v. The Gap, Inc.
122 F. Supp. 3d 1338 (M.D. Fla. 2015), aff’d, 684 Fed.Appx. 981 (11th Cir. 2016)
Following an evidentiary hearing, on behalf of client The Gap, Inc. and its Old Navy brand, the Firm was successful in defeating a motion for a preliminary injunction brought by plaintiff Hoop Culture,More
Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. v. Krush Global Limited
Opposition No. 91180742 & Cancellation No. 92048446m 2010 WL 3798550 (T.T.A.B. 2010)
Prevailed at trial on behalf of Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. in consolidated opposition and cancellation proceedings against the mark, CRUSSH.More
Chanel, Inc. v. Camacho & Camacho LLP
Opp. No. 91229126 (T.T.A.B. 2018)
We Represented Chanel in establishing the fame for Chanel’s CC monogram prior to 2002, and that Chanel’s CC Monogram mark is a household name.More
JR Tobacco of America, Inc. v. Davidoff of Geneva (CT), Inc.
1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1501 (S.D.N.Y. February 13, 1997)
The court granted the motion for summary judgment we filed on behalf of
Davidoff, a maker of premium cigars. JR used Davidoff’s trademarks in
advertising for “JR Alternative” cigars, which JR claimed duplicated
famous brands. Davidoff asserted that the use of its trademarks in JR’s ads
constituted trademark infringement and that JR’s advertising claims were false.More